Bella Diva's profileMusings, Annoyances and ...PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
Musings, Annoyances and RantsThings that make me think. |
|||||||||||||||||
July 16 Math WarsI admit, I'm old enough to remember manual pencil sharpeners, cars that, when the hood is opened, allowed you to still see the ground, telephones with round dials (I'm still hassling "dialing a number" on a phone with buttons, but that's my problem.), televisions without remotes and 45s (records, not the gun). So, reading an article on parents who are going against the current teaching, and showing their children long division. I have to admit I read the story because I couldn't figure out, for the life of me, what the parents were doing wrong. I finally reached the paragraph that explained.
Apparently, the current teaching theory says that kids are taught the comcepts. As someone said in the story, ": "Would you want to go to a doctor who's learned about the concepts but never done the surgery? Would you want your doctor to say I had the right IDEA when I removed your appendix, though I took out the wrong one?"
OK, I'm willing to defend teachers and methodology. However, another paragraph explained what the children are being taught:
". . .multiply 88 by 5, we'll do it with pen and paper, multiplying 8 by 5 and carrying over the 4, etc.
But a child today might reason that 5 is half of 10, and 88 times 10 is 880, so 88 times 5 is half of
that, 440 . . ."
I had enough trouble with long division - instead I still do - but I don't know that I would have been nearly as close if the above method was taught. I think I understand the idea, but, even without any children, I believe in the fundamentals.
Of course, it would have been better if there were more than a single example in the story, but I guess editors have their priorities.
No matter what, 2 plus 2 equals 4. I guess it doesn't really matter how you get there as long as you do, but I still have questions.
Calculators in the classroom. Math programs on the computer. I think I like the idea that people once were expected to think for themselves. I guess we've come a long was since then. That is, until the computer crashes. (After all, we are talking about a PC, usually running one of the inevitably popular operating systems by Microsoft. (Did I say popular?) Forgive me, I'm tired.
I have to admit I'm no math wizard. In fact, I don't even balance my checkbook. I just make it a point to never write checks, or make electronic payments, in excess of my last deposit. This means, if all goes well, I have a little next egg at the end of the year.
Life is good. Who needs concepts?
July 15 A Great WeekendWent to Cambria last weekend. It was something of an impulse.
I was invited to a production of High School Musical. OK, it would NOT have been my first choice, but I know the costumer. So, I promised I'd be there. Because I never like to put a large number of miles on my car (a 10-year-old Mazda Protege with less than 80,000 miles - every time I take it into the dealership for service, the Service Manager tells me he has at least 10 people who would love to buy my car.)
All right, I'm like everyone else. Trade me a car for car, and I'll love you forever. I want a new car, but I don't want a car note. (See the problem)
So, in keeping with my personal tradition, I rented a car. Actually, made a reservation with Enterprise here in my neighborhood. As with all good things, something always goes wrong. This time I thought I had everything in hand. I selected a reservation time for 2-1/2 hours before I needed to leave. Would you believe they managed to screw that up? Apparently, only a handful - a small handful - of people work on Saturdays. This seems to be especially true on the Saturday I need a car. Needless to say, I had to get a neighbor to take me to the office that promises to "pick you up". This would have worked if I lived in their parking lot. Unfortunately, - no, make that fortunately, I don't.
I arrived at the office only to discover that they were still very very busy. I might add that no one told me I was suppose to put my name on a list for attention. By the time the young woman behind the desk realized her mistake, it was apparent that "I was not happy." Anyway, I finally got her attention. After completing the paperwork, while apologizing, she walked me to the lot behind the office, pick up the car she said was waiting. At the last minute, she offered me an upgrade . . . . A Tahoe. I had to explain that I don't drive trucks. If she paid close attention, she would see that I wanted a car. Next, she was walking me toward a Pontiac when I saw . . . TADA . . . and asked, "Who gets the convertible?"
I was looking at a silver Ford Mustang convertible. "You want it?" "How much is it?" "I'll give it to you for the same price." "Yes, I'd like to have the Ford."
And there I was, driving down the highway, top down, Breathe, by Soul Food, coming from the CD player. Life is good.
Let's hear it for impulse.
The production was great. I publically admitted that I would have never seen that particular production had it not been for a promise to a friend. However, I'm glad I went. Other than the fact the music does make you bounce in your seat, I learned something. If we could figure out how to harness the youthful energy I saw that afternoon, we would have one of the best and cleanest sources of energy in the world. There would be no need to raise energy prices.
All right, now I have a car, a convertible, and a whole day (Sunday) ahead with no real commitments. Whoo-hoo!! I heard the highway calling. At 9:00 A.M. Sunday, I was on the highway, headed north toward Cambria, my favorite place in all of California. (I allow for the state limit because I might eventually find another place that I love as much, but it's really hard to imagine at this moment.)
I had lunch at Robins (http://www.robinsrestaurant.com/), my favorite restaurant in Cambria. I stopped in to say hello to Terry (or Teri, I keep forgetting to ask) the owner of the Burton Inn. (If you're looking for a quite, but friend place to get away, check out this website: http://www.burtoninn.com/ . Anyway, this is my place for relaxing.
I also visited my favorite winery (http://www.harmonycellars.com/). They have won so many awards, they rotate them on the wall behind the tasting counter.
Jeez, I just realized this is looking like a product placement paradise. No, that's not my intent. These are just the places that I enjoy.
Anyway, along the way, I took a few photographs. Yes, I'm still learning my cameras.
Nothing really exciting happened, but it was a wonderful weekend. I'm only sorry that (1) it was so short and (2) I had to return the car. OK, I know both of those were true and inevitable, but that doesn't change anything. I always return ready to face new challanges. Well, small new challanges. It seems wrong to ruin a good feeling with reality. Oh, such is the way.
So, now I've had two full days of my own reality and I'm ready for another weekend. Maybe without the rental, but in the long run, that doesn't really matter. Weekeneds are special, even in an older car. (Its old and dirty, but at least its paid for - doesn't get much better than that.)
January 17 I have a toyHeaven help me, I have a new toy. I bought an Olympus Evolt 500 DSLR. I had a little digital Canon – and I do mean ‘little’. The thing is about the size of my phone. There was nothing wrong with that camera. In fact, I love some of the photos that I took, but in a time before digital, I had an Olympus OM-1. During that time, I carried that camera everywhere I went – and I went some interesting places. I was, at one time, stage manager and occasional lighting manage for a modern dance company in Detroit. It was a fascinating time. The dancers were young and unbelievably enthusiastic. And they were all there for the photographing. Because I was always with my camera, they paid no attention to me. Add to that, the fact that the Olympus has the quietest shutter of its day; they rarely knew when I actually took a shot. I actually used an SLR for the first time while attending a dance conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota. A friend of mine had become fascinated with photography, purchased a camera and enrolled in a college course on photography. This had nothing to do with his major, but that’s another story. Somehow (I really don’t remember how it happened), I traded the use of my car for the period I would be gone for the use of his camera for the same length of time. I returned four days later with nine rolls of film. I was hooked! Shortly thereafter, my friend invited me to attend one of his photography classes. Later I discovered that there was an ulterior motive. My friend had taken a photograph of me while I was crocheting. (Remember the part about the quiet shutter?) I knew nothing about it until he showed to finished product in 16x20 glory. Ok, the problem? Friend presented the photograph of me to his instructor as completion of an assignment. His instructor loved the image. It was somewhat dramatic. I was seated at the end of a couch that had no arms, in front a lamp that was the only illumination in the room. Everything else was black. As I said, the instructor loved the image but he insisted that he had been printed backwards. That was the reason I was invited to class. I was there to prove that I was left-handed, but did everything just as a right-handed person. The only difference was I used a different hand. The class was interesting, although I was a little troubled by the images of one of the students. For me, it was hard to sit through class examination of, and comment on, four shots of what seemed to me to be the same bush. Not only did it appear to be the same vegetation, the bush was dead. Or, at the very least, it had dropped its leaves. There was another student whose muse led him to photograph sleeping derelicts. Thank God the photographs were in black-and-white. Anyway, two things came out of that visit. After learning that I was (A) a graduate of the university and (B) really interested in photography, the instruction invited me to take his class in the upcoming quarter. I really wanted to take the class, but I couldn’t afford the graduate fees. After a moment, the instructor the instructor invited me to sit in on the class. I couldn’t refuse. It wasn't going to cost me a cent. I was treated as a class member in the next quarter. He even took to the photography lab and introduced me to the attendants with an explanation – the truth. So, from that day forward, everyone who worked in the lab knew me and knew my special circumstances. They even took messages for me because, as I Iearned to develop and print my photographs, I could, and often did, stay in the lab for hours. To see one of the images I shot appear in the developing solution was always something of an exercise in magic. By the way, never, never, ever take a photograph of a blond, very pale child at high noon. (That’s a story for a later time.) One day, I had placed one of my photographs on a drying rack in the main room, outside of the darkroom. It was the photograph of the blond, very pale child at high noon that had taken me hours to tease into a photograph. I had returned to the darkroom to work on a photograph of sax player that I had taken at a concert in a local park. The image had to be worked and it was driving me mad. In the midst of questioning why I didn’t choose some other way to beat myself over the head. At that moment I heard a male voice express an interest in the photograph of the child. When he asked the name of the photographer, both of the attendants began what I like to think of as diversionary tactics. By any name, it worked. It seems that the voice I heard belonged to another photography instructor. It would have been a little difficult to explain why I was given access to the university photography lab and I wasn’t a student. For me, it was an exciting time. Oops, I just looked at the clock. I have got to go to bed and I’ve haven’t got to the new toy. I have to give you the rest of the story later. I’m trying to develop a real schedule. Pleasant dreams.
January 16 Buying Pieces . . .
I am old enough to remember the test tube baby and the furor that advance caused in the press. There have been other advances that have been announced with less and less critical press. We were amazed at the medical skill that allowed physicians to reattach various portions of the human anatomy that humans managed to maul, mangle, and amputate. Children who have fingers reattached after playing with the lawn mower, adults who have hands reattached after having somehow managed to get the extremity caught in equipment secretly designed to removed these appendages. After the pacemaker, we even felt hope at the idea of an artificial heart. By the way, the man who invented the artificial heart also invented the artificial kidney dialysis machine. Come on, that will come in handy the next time you’re on Jeopardy. We have finally accepted transplants of the lung, heart, kidney, various portions of the eyes and various pieces of skin. Ok, I’m fine with that, but today I read something that really makes me scratch my head. Physicians are now planning to transplant a womb. Not just a womb, but lacking sufficient living donors, they are planning to transplant a womb from a cadaver. Let’s look at established cost. For a liver transplant, the approximate cost for the first 3 – 6 months is $6,777.50. After approximately five months, the cost is $3645.50. Therefore, the cost for a liver transplant is $60,000 to $90,000. And a heart transplant costs $75,000 to $125,000. Now this leads to the next question. How much is one willing to pay for a womb? (I’m not going to address the question of a used womb. I see no fine definition of the plans, going forward, but I have some questions. How much is one expected to pay for a used womb”? Do we know whether or not the ‘cadaver’ previously bore a child? If so, is there a price adjustment? Is there a discount based on the number of times it was used? Such as: if the cadaver, before it got dead, bore three children, does that womb cost less than a womb that is virtually new (no children)? Now only that, the womb, which promises the possibility of pregnancy, can only be used one time. Once the pregnancy is completed – I think that’s called ‘birth’ – the womb is to be removed. Does the patient have to add the cost of removal to the entire procedure? If the womb doesn’t work, is it possible to have another transplant? We could continue this for many such operations until a child is produced. Here, we are excluding costs. Ok, let’s say we get passed all of the other questions. What do you say to the child when he/she starts to ask where they came from? A Used Stork? By the time I finished reading the article, I had another question: If this works, could a man be the next subject for this procedure? OMG!!! How would you like to explain that one to the little one?
January 15 Things that go. . . .The other day I engaged in a conversation with a friend about the typical ponderables. You know, things like: the locations of things lost such as socks that disappear from the dryer, favorite pens that disappear from the place you know you put them. He had nerve enough to add the last of the cookies that you are certain you left in the cupboard. (I told him I wasn't at all sure that cookies count.) My personal favorite, however, are reading glasses that just walk away.
I know this from personal experience. I put a pair of reading glasses, in their case, in my purse. By the time I reached my home, the glasses had disappeared. No, I made no stops between locations. They were gone and, even after searching my car, I didn’t find them. I am now in the process of replacing them.
I would have given it no thought whatsoever, until I heard about an earring. A very special earring. I saw the headline Marlene Dietrich's lost earring finally found after 73 years! Truthfully, I gave it little thought. Oh, I guess I was surprised to learn that she enjoyed amusement parks. But that was about it.
Anyway, I started thinking about a series of conversations I have had a co-worker (not that one, another one) who regularly talks to me about String Theory. I can spell it and I have a very general idea of the concepts. My fascination was peaked when he mention that this theory supports at least 11 dimensions. I decided that it was fun to listen to but very difficult to prove.
Now, I think there is proof. Things have begun slipping through from one, or more, of those dimensions. Yes, I know how this sounds, but if there had been only one of these occurrences I don’t think I would have given it any thought, but a day or two later I was reading a two-day old newspaper and discovered that the earring was only the latest items to suddenly reappear.
Still, I chose to give it little thought until today’s news. I just discovered that there has been another instance:
Man gets postcard postmarked in 1949
The card was addressed to Mrs. M.K. Hethington on King Street. A one-cent stamp was on the back, along with a postmark from Hendersonville, N.C., dated June 28, 1949.
This is fascinating for many reasons, not the least of which is that the recipient, a retired police chief, with the same last name, had to research his family history to discover that the original recipient was his great-aunt who died in 1972. He received the card in a plain white envelope with no message or return address.
After that I started thinking. I know, it’s a little dangerous at times, but not this time. At least, I don’t think so.
Anyway, there have been several of these ‘returns’ recently. Among the most reported are:
Man's Wallet Returned After 62 Years – this was lost during WWII.
Ring finds its owner after 27 years in the Gulf of Mexico – this was a graduation ring that her father bought for her when she was 17, in 1978.
Ok, the last one was returned a little early, in the scheme of things, but I wonder if that could have anything to do with the fact that the ring was lost in the water. After all, the other items were lost on land. I admit I don’t really know where the postcard was lost, but because it fits the time cycle, I suspect it wasn’t dropped in the water.
I have decided that it will eventually be possible to test this theory. Four days ago, I read the following:
Lost: One big snake. Really big. The Blalock family on Truman Street behind Thomson First Presbyterian Church is looking for Jake the Snake - a six-foot-long Columbian Red-Tailed boa constrictor that has been the family pet for more than 10 years. So, if my theory is correct Jake should eventually reappear. Here’s the problem: all of the other examples were inanimate objects. Jake on the other hand, although cold blooded, is still defined as animate. So, when he slips away there is no measure that can be used to determine his return. There have been other notable localized disappearances of animate. For instance: between 1920 and 1950, the town of Bennington, Vermont has been the site of serveral comletely unexplained disappearances: On December 1, 1949, a Mr. Tetford vanished from a crowded bus.. On December 1, 1946, an 18-year-old student named Paula Welden vanished while taking a walk.
Of course, there is some validation for questions regarding the return of animate objects. After all, Judge Crater disappeared in 1930, and he hasn’t reappeared yet. Nor has Ambrose Bierce, who disappeared in 1913. I admit that this one might not really count because Bierce was on his way to join Pancho Villa. A gravestone was placed in a cemetery in Sierra Mojada in 1914, but there is no body beneath the stone. I guess we have a number of years to test the theory. It should be interesting to learn what happens with the more learned of our species takes a look at this idea. Of course, Jake may have to get in line behind Judge Crater and Ambrose Bierce.
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|